A Review of Jeffrey Encke’s
MOST WANTED: A gamble in verse
in
the form of a deck of cards, 52 cards, 2 jokers
by
Alexis Vergalla
I was taught
to read in a linear fashion, as most of us are. Letters followed each other in
sequence, definitions could be discerned from context, and linear narrative was
standard fare. I don’t remember veering
away from narrative, but it happened.
Still, books were contained by spines. The pages turned in an orderly
fashion. There was never an alternative.
Jeffrey Encke’s collection Most Wanted: A Gamble in Verse is
different. Holding it feels
dangerous in the way that Pandora’s Box was dangerous. Here is a book contained in cardboard and
cellophane—an unfamiliar format without a spine to hold it in order. There is something satisfying about having to
unwrap a collection of poetry. The
plastic falls away and the words begin.
Starting
with the outline of a silhouette on the leader card, Encke’s
collection alludes both in title and image to the infamous “Most Wanted” deck
of cards put out by the U. S. Military that depicted wanted Iraqi
terrorists. However, while those cards
each had a rectangular portrait against a blank white background, Encke’s cards are far more complex. Designed by Encke and Vivek
Chadaga, no two cards are visually similar. The images are distressed and the text looks
typed on. The hearts tend towards
rust-bloody reds, most of the spades have a sick yellow-green hue, but nothing
is consistent. The seven of spades is
dark and the suit and number are both almost impossible to read. White text vividly cuts across the lower
third, reading “the stench of supper/ripples my lips”. Taken alone, these words are unsettling. Within the context of the deck and the text
that might lead or follow, the words become sinister and violent.
Encke
confronts his reader with 52 beginnings, 51 second verses, 50 choices for a
third... A run from the nine to the jack
of diamonds reads: (“all you asked/was that I bring you/hellebore,
cantaloupe,/guava, water”) (“I hoped to unlock/the answers,/to sweep the
barrel/of the skull”) (“and years later,/as my body entered change,/you flooded
in/with your amens,/your ricin
tinctures”). But shuffle the cards, and
the poem changes. The permutations feel
endless.
In my first
flip through the deck, I dismissed the violence. I clung to the five of diamonds (“dictating
your name/to the world/in gestures”) and the four of hearts (“between our/heavy
breath/and the world’s/a couple strolls”).
I found the verses that are stark and beautiful and verses that seemed
like pieces of conversation between lovers.
The advantage of a shifting deck is that you can deal the cards in your
own favor if you know how to shuffle them right. As I played with the cards, a darker tone
that I couldn’t control began to emerge.
On the pale green seven of clubs, “a man presses stars/into an empty
box,/roping them down/with tweezers and glue” and the act of collage becomes an
act of restraint and confinement. The
violence is tamped down on the eight of spades with “I hear a muffle/of an
ultimatum”. Though few of the cards
directly address terrorism, the emotions involved are an ever present
undercurrent running beneath the collection. Still, with a whole deck of
options, nothing is clear cut.
The speaker
shifts from card to card to become captor and captive, observer and
observed. A body is constructed between
the cards but as the cards change the body changes. The poem is constantly in flux and specific
details are difficult to pin down. The
ten of hearts proclaims “we speak openly/of taboos,/keeping the heads/of our
enemies/closest,/and fresh” and the three of spades answers “look at what I
have done,/this shameful thing,/saying too much/of nothing”.
Most
Wanted is not an
easy collection. Poetry demands
attention of a different sort than playing cards, but Encke confronts us with
both at the same time. It is simple
enough to flip through the cards and absorb this collection as though a game,
but Encke asks more. To read this
collection takes true participation. He
writes, on the eight of clubs, “we shared/the responsibility of blood,/the
imprint of fear/in their eyes”. It is
each reader’s decision where to move next.