Lucille
Clifton’s Blessing the Boats: New
and Selected Poems 1988 – 2000
Reviewed
by
Michelle Cordova
Lucille
Clifton
masterfully creates poetry that is seemingly simple in its language,
short
lines and lack of punctuation or capitalization. A
minimalist poet – her use of common
language, quiet images, and short lines all create poems filled with
complexities of raw and rich emotion, history, and truth.
Although her work is often spare and simple,
it is always beautifully and painstakingly crafted into poems that tell
the
truth, poems that insist on residing within the reader, poems by a poet
who
seeks and achieves the ability to be a vehicle and a voice for those
who may
not otherwise speak.
Clifton’s collection Blessing
the Boats: New and Selected Poems 1988 – 2000 assembles her
most poignant
past work as well as new poems which clearly identify the poet as
question-bearer. Poems such as
“august” and “white lady”
explore and ask questions about cocaine addiction in the black
community and in
the family. These poems travel through
the personal and the political and do not seek to provide answers to
the
questions posed; rather, they ask questions from a place of desperation
and
loss. In “august” Clifton uses
the
epigraph, “for laine,” (Clifton’s sister), which
serves to personalize the poem
so that its readers take hold of the reality from which this poem was
born. Clifton chronicles the battle of
drug
addiction within the family as it affects not only the user, but his
sisters as
well. It is in this poem that Clifton
becomes question-bearer as she repeats, “what would we
give?” Clifton is asking
her sister what price they would pay to have their brother back, to
intervene
on his behalf, and make him aware of his impending death.
The poem continues with “what would we give /
to fuss with him again, / he who clasped his hands / as if in prayer
and melted
/ to our mother?” The questions that
she
is asking clearly illustrate the longing and the desperation to have
him back
even if it is just to “blame him for his sins” or to
“fuss with him
again.” These are not enjoyable acts
that Clifton wishes to relive with her brother and sister, but there is
a
desperation illustrated by the series of questions and the content of
their
language. She wants her brother back
even as he was. Clifton closes the poem
with a final question: “What / would we give / to smile and
staple him / back
into our arms, / our honey boy, our sam, / not clean, / not sober, not
/ better
than he was, but / oh, at least, alive?” These
aching last lines further convey the
pain in having lost her brother and the desperation to have him back in
any
form he comes. The repetition of the
question “what would we give” serves to transform the
question into “would we
give anything, or would we let him go?”
It is not the answer to questions with which Clifton is
concerned, but
the questioning itself.
The personal becomes political in “white lady” as
Clifton
asks, “what will it cost / to keep our children / what will it
cost / to buy
them back.” Clifton does not attempt
to
know the answer to the question she asks and almost does not leave room
for an
answer by placing a period at the end instead of a question mark. It seems that for Clifton, this is an
unanswerable question. There is no
solution, so she continues with: “white lady / says I want you /
whispers / let
me be your lover / whispers / run me through your fingers / feel me
smell me
taste me / love me / nobody understands you like / white lady.” These short lines and lack of punctuation
create a rhythm in the poem that represents the quick and overpowering
seduction of cocaine. At the close of
the poem Clifton again poses questions, and this time directly to
“white lady”
asking, “white lady / what do we have to pay / to repossess our
children /
white lady / what do we have to owe / to own our own at last.” Like the first question asked in the poem,
these questions are left without question marks at the end of them;
however,
they are not ended with periods either.
This altogether lack of punctuation leaves the reader with a
sense that
these questions will be asked over and over without answer. Perhaps the answer lies within the questions
themselves. Perhaps the pleas of the
mothers in the black community will bring their children back. Perhaps.
While
these poems do not speak
fully to the book’s richness and complexity, they do speak to the
duty of the
poet to bring to light questions we might not otherwise ask. Other notable poems are
“dialysis,” and
“donor” in which Clifton explores and asks questions about
the cancer that
threatened to murder her. In
“dialysis”
Clifton “crawls out of the fire […] grateful to be alive
[…] alive and
furious,” and asks, “Blessed be even this?”
In “donor” Clifton addresses her daughter, the
daughter she almost
aborted years before, the daughter who will now save her life, asking,
“suppose
my body does say no / to yours.” But again, this question is
ended with a
period in place of a question mark. This
book’s dream sequence ponders, wonders, almost questions what it
would be like
to be other entities or persons: “my dream about being
white,” “my dream about
the cows,” “my dream about time,” “my dream
about falling,” “my dream about the
second coming,” “my dream about God,” “my dream
about the poet.”
Within
Blessing the Boats, Lucille Clifton
comes bearing questions. While she may
not always come bearing the answers, she perpetually comes bearing
light.